The Crypt
The Crypt
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Shy's Cyber Chamber
 The Attic
 Is DNA effective in identifying persons?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Topic  

shy
Crypt Keeper
shy

Australia
2014 Posts

Posted - 14 February 2006 :  12:38:57 PM  Show Profile  Visit shy's Homepage  Send shy an ICQ Message  Click to see shy's MSN Messenger address Send shy a Private Message  Reply with Quote
[answer provided by Daniel Drell of the U.S. DOE Human Genome Program]

DNA identification can be quite effective if used intelligently. Portions of the DNA sequence that vary the most among humans must be used; also, portions must be large enough to overcome the fact that human mating is not absolutely random.

Consider the scenario of a crime scene investigation . . .

Assume that type O blood is found at the crime scene. Type O occurs in about 45% of Americans. If investigators type only for ABO, then finding that the "suspect" in a crime is type O really doesn't reveal very much.

If, in addition to being type O, the suspect is a blond, and blond hair is found at the crime scene, then you now have two bits of evidence to suggest who really did it. However, there are a lot of Type O blonds out there.

If you find that the crime scene has footprints from a pair of Nike Air Jordans (with a distinctive tread design) and the suspect, in addition to being type O and blond, is also wearing Air Jordans with the same tread design, then you are much closer to linking the suspect with the crime scene.

In this way, by accumulating bits of linking evidence in a chain, where each bit by itself isn't very strong but the set of all of them together is very strong, you can argue that your suspect really is the right person.

With DNA, the same kind of thinking is used; you can look for matches (based on sequence or on numbers of small repeating units of DNA sequence) at a number of different locations on the person's genome; one or two (even three) aren't enough to be confident that the suspect is the right one, but four (sometimes five) are used and a match at all five is rare enough that you (or a prosecutor or a jury) can be very confident ("beyond a reasonable doubt") that the right person is accused.



nobtis
Corpse
nobtis

USA
16 Posts

Posted - 05 July 2006 :  1:34:57 PM  Show Profile  Visit nobtis's Homepage  Send nobtis an AOL message  Click to see nobtis's MSN Messenger address  Send nobtis a Yahoo! Message Send nobtis a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Some people have two sets of DNA in their bodies. For example, the DNA in one's blood may be different than in one's sperm, or the DNA of one's skin can be different than in one's internal organs, etc... This has to be researched more since many rapists and murderes are getting out of prison solely based on DNA...and they COULD BE GUILTY!
Go to Top of Page
  Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
The Crypt © shyscyberchamber.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000